Dependability of cyber-physical computer systems with embedded microprocessors.

Authors

  • Fedukhin O.V. https://orcid.org/0000–0001–7756–0004 , Institute of Mathematical Machines and Systems Problems image/svg+xml
  • Skrypnikova O.O. https://orcid.org/0009–0008–2309–7569 , Institute of Mathematical Machines and Systems Problems image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34121/1028-9763-2026-3-112-125

Keywords:

dependability, cyber-physical systems, embedded microprocessors, Internet of Things, functional safety, fault tolerance, digital twin, failure prediction, self-healing systems, redundancy, formal verification

Abstract

The paper presents a systematic analysis of the current state of the theory and practice of ensuring the dependability of cyber-physical computer systems with embedded microprocessors. The evolution of the concept of dependability from the classical Avizienis-Laprie-Randell taxonomy to contemporary approaches is examined. The major challenges arising from the widespread adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence, cloud and edge computing, distributed services, and digital twins are analyzed. It is shown that traditional reliability assessment methods do not fully address the dynamic nature of modern cyber-physical systems, the interdependencies among software components, the resource constraints of IoT devices, or emerging cybersecurity threats. Contemporary architectural approaches to improving dependability are summarized, including Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE), integrated safety and security analysis, digital twin technologies, fault injection techniques, predictive maintenance, and dependability design patterns. Modern tools for formal verification, modeling, risk analysis, and fault-tolerance testing are also reviewed. Software and hardware mechanisms for ensuring dependability are systematized, including redundancy, active replication, N-version programming, checkpointing, recovery blocks, health monitoring mechanisms, and reconfigurable architectures. The necessity of transitioning from static assessment models to adaptive run-time dependability assurance methods based on machine learning, operational telemetry analysis, and automated failure prediction is substantiated. Tabl.: 1. Figs.: 3. Refs.: 13 titles.

References

1. Avizienis A., Laprie J.C., Randell B. Fundamental concepts of dependability. Journal of Systems and Software. 1980. P. 5–12. URL: https://pld.ttu.ee/IAF0530/16/avi1.pdf.

2. URL: https://journals.nupp.edu.ua/sunz/en/article/view/3823.

3. URL: https://eng.iotexpo.com.cn/industry–news/iot–connectivity–ai–adoption–2025.html.

4. Скрипнікова О.О., Ґедзь О.В., Оцун Б.М. Елементи імітаційного моделювання відмовостійкості програмного забезпечення диспетчеризації розподіленої системи керування інженерним обладнанням висотних будівель. Global Trends in Science: Research, Innovation and Development: Рroc. of the 2nd Intern. Scient. and Pract. сonf. (Sep. 29 – Oct. 1, 2025). Varna, Bulgaria, 2025. P. 160–165. URL: https://www.eoss–conf.com/wp–content/uploads/2025/09/Varna_Bulgaria_29.09.25.pdf.

5. Mohammad Rezaul Karim1, Sohag Kabir2, Ci Lei3 , Raluca Lefticaru4, and Mohammad Abdul Baset. A Combined Approach to Safety and Security of IoT by Applying Fault Tree Analysis and Attack Trees with Minimal Cut Sets. Aviation Electronics, Information Technology, Telecommunications, Electricals, and Controls (AVITEC). 2025. Vol. 7, N 2. P. 113–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28989/avitec.v7i2.2918.

6. Friedenthal S., Moore A., Steiner R. A Practical Guide to SysML: The Systems Modeling Language. 3rd ed. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann, 2015. 640 p.

7. Feiler P.H., Gluch D.P. Model-Based Engineering with AADL: An Introduction to the SAE Architecture Analysis and Design Language. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2013. 760 p.

8. Madni A.M., Purohit S., Madni C.C. Exploiting Digital Twins in MBSE to Enhance System Modeling and Life Cycle Coverage. Handbook of Model-Based Systems Engineering. Cham: Springer. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–030–93582–5_33.

9. Abdulkhaleq A., Wagner S. STPA-Sec: Safety Meets Security. Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP Workshops). Springer, 2015. P. 33–48.

10. Larsen P.G., Fitzgerald J., Woodcock J. How Do We Engineer Trustworthy Digital Twins? Research Directions: Cyber-Physical Systems. 2023. Vol. 1. e3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbp.2023.3.

11. Begun V., Hedz O., Begun S., Analysis of the Importance of Electronic Components in Automated Smoke Protection Systems for Modern High–Rise Buildings. SCIREA Journal of Information Science and Systems Science. 2025. Vol. 9, Issue 2, April 2025. P. 60–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54647/isss1204.

12. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073–431X/12/10/214.

13. Муха Ар.А., Федухин А.В. К вопросу о достоверности функционирования компьютерных систем с квазимостиковой структурой. URL: https://www.immsp.kiev.ua/publications/articles/2019/ 2019_3/ 03_Feduchin_19.pdf.

Downloads

Views: 12
Downloads: 12

Published

2026-09-14

Issue

Section

QUALITY, RELIABILITY, AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPUTER TECHNIQUE AND SOFTWARE

How to Cite

Dependability of cyber-physical computer systems with embedded microprocessors. (2026). Mathematical Machines and Systems, 3, 112-125. https://doi.org/10.34121/1028-9763-2026-3-112-125