Spatial grasp model for dynamic distributed systems

Authors

  • Sapaty P.S. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4168-7190 , Institute of Mathematical Machines and Systems Problems of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34121/1028-9763-2021-3-3-21

Keywords:

algorithm, flowchart, distributed systems, spatial grasp, spatial chart, holistic solutions, network management, collective behavior, space debris, global viruses, алгоритм, блок-схема, розподілені системи, просторове захоплення, просторова діаграма, цілісні рішення, управління мережею, колективна поведінка, космічне сміття, глобальні віруси

Abstract

More complex distributed and intelligent systems which relate to economy, ecology, communications, security and defense, and cover both terrestrial and celestial environments are being developed. Their efficient management, especially in dynamic and unpredictable situations, needs serious investigations and development in scientific and technological areas. Their traditional representations as parts operating by certain algorithms and exchanging messages are becoming inadequate as such systems need much stronger integration to operate as holistic organisms pursuing global and often varying goals. This paper is focused on a completely different paradigm for organization and management of large dynamic and distributed systems. This paradigm extends and transforms the notion of an algorithm for the description of knowledge processing logic. Moreover, it allows it to exist, propagate and operate as an integral whole in any distributed spaces which may constantly change their volumes and structures. Taking into consideration some organizational features related to dangerous viruses, as well as recent pandemics, this ubiquitous Spatial Grasp (SG) model is presented in the paper at philosophical and implementation levels, together with the introduction of special spatial charts for its exhibition and studies, which extend traditional algorithmic flowcharts towards working directly in distributed spaces. Utilization of this model for creation of resultant Spatial Grasp Technology and its basic Spatial Grasp Language, already described in details in numerous publications, is briefed as well. Elementary examples of dealing with distributed networks, collective human-robotic behavior, removal of space debris by a constellation of cleaning satellites and simulating the spread of virus and vaccination against it explain SG advantages over traditional system organizations.

References

1. Algorithm. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithm.

2. Definition of ALGORITHM. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/algorithm.

3. Goodrich M.T., Tamassia R. Algorithm Design: Foundations, Analysis, and Internet Examples. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20150428201622/http:/ww3.algorithmdesign.net/ch00-front.html.

4. Heuristic. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic.

5. Flowchart. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flowchart.

6. Lynch A. Flow Chart Design – How to design a good flowchart, 04/22/2021. URL: https://www.edrawsoft.com/flowchartdesign.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjw5auGBhDEARIsAFyNm9H7cWvesxjTsposJTaD890zBspEUDA18dHi_9R_GChiyzitwgpYCu4aAjutEALw_wcB.

7. Sapaty P.S. Symbiosis of Real and Simulated Worlds under Spatial Grasp Technology. Springer, 2021. 251 p.

8. Sapaty P.S. Complexity in International Security: A Holistic Spatial Approach, Emerald Publishing, 2019. 160 p.

9. Sapaty P.S. Holistic Analysis and Management of Distributed Social Systems, Springer, 2018. 234 p.

10. Sapaty P.S. Managing Distributed Dynamic Systems with Spatial Grasp Technology, Springer, 2017. 284 p.

11. Sapaty P.S. Ruling Distributed Dynamic Worlds. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. 255 p.

12. Sapaty P.S. Mobile Processing in Distributed and Open Environments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999. 410 p.

13. Sapaty P.S. A distributed processing system, European Patent N 0389655, Publ. 10.11.93, European Patent Office. 35 p.

14. Sapaty P.S. Global Network Management under Spatial Grasp Paradigm, Global Journal of Researches in Engineering: J General Engineering. 2013. Vol. 20, Issue 5, Version 1.0 Year 20. P. 58–69. URL: https://engineeringresearch.org/index.php/GJRE/article/view/2082/2013.

15. Sapaty P.S. Spatial Management of Large Constellations of Small Satellites. Mathematical machines and systems. 2021. N 2. P. 3–14.

16. Sapaty P.S. Global Management of Space Debris Removal Under Spatial Grasp Technology. Acta Scientific COMPUTER SCIENCES. 2021. Vol. 3, Issue 7. URL: https://www.actascientific.com/ASCS/pdf/ASCS-03-0135.pdf.

17. Space Debris. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_debris

18. Space Debris, NASA Headquarters Library. URL: https://www.nasa.gov/centers/hq/library/find/bibliographies/space_debris.

19. Deorbit Systems, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2020. Nov. 28. URL: https://www.nasa.gov/smallsat-institute/sst-soa-2020/passive-deorbit-systems.

20. Chen Y. et al. Optimal mission planning of active space debris removal based on genetic algorithm, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020. N 715, P. 012025. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/715/1/012025/pdf.

21. Sapaty P.S. Managing multiple satellite architectures by spatial grasp technology. Mathematical machines and systems. 2021. N 1. P. 3–16. http://www.immsp.kiev.ua/publications/eng/2021_1/.

22. Sapaty P.S. Fighting global viruses under spatial grasp technology. Transactions on Engineering and Computer Science. 2020. Vol. 1 Issue 2. URL: https://gnoscience.com/uploads/journals/articles/118001716716.pdf.

23. Sapaty Р.S. Spatial Grasp as a Model for Space-based Control and Management Systems. Mathematical machines and systems. 2021. N 1. P. 135–138. URL: http://www.immsp.kiev.ua/publications/articles/2021/2021_1/Sapaty_book_1_2021.pdf.

Downloads

Views: 10
Downloads: 6

Published

2021-09-01

How to Cite

Spatial grasp model for dynamic distributed systems. (2021). Mathematical Machines and Systems, 3, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.34121/1028-9763-2021-3-3-21